2025B: Law of Evidence – NALSAR Forums

Tagged: Dibs for project

This topic has 54 replies, 53 voices, and was last updated 2 years, 7 months ago by Shruti Avinash (2020-62).

Creator

Topic
July 2, 2022 at 6:25 pm #29268
DGV Rithvik (2018-75)
Super Administrator
@dgv-rithvik
Dibs for “2025B: Law of Evidence” go here:
Creator

Topic

Viewing 52 reply threads

Author

Replies
- October 10, 2022 at 8:36 am #30486
  Shruti Avinash (2020-62)
  Academic Representative
  @shruti-avinash
  Type-5
  
  Study of interplay between Attorney-Client Privilege and Data Privacy/Interception Regimes
  
  Shruti Avinash
- October 8, 2022 at 5:03 pm #30481
  Avantika Kalra (2020-11)
  Participant
  @avantika-kalra
  Type-5: Character Evidence in Rape Trials.
- October 7, 2022 at 3:07 pm #30474
  Ishika Mangesh Dube (2020-17)
  Participant
  @ishika-mangesh-dube
  Type 5 – admissibility of social media evidence
  - This reply was modified 2 years, 7 months ago by Ishika Mangesh Dube (2020-17).
- October 7, 2022 at 2:37 pm #30473
  Harshvardhan Singh Nathawat (2020-24)
  Participant
  @harshvardhan-singh-nathawat
  Type 5 – Competency and Credibility of Child Witness
- October 7, 2022 at 11:19 am #30468
  Suhani Paruvelly (2020-42)
  Academic Representative
  @suhani-paruvellye
  Type 5 – Admissibility of evidence under Section 154 – Hostile witness
  - This reply was modified 2 years, 7 months ago by Suhani Paruvelly (2020-42).
- October 3, 2022 at 3:00 pm #30433
  Devarshi Ranjan (2020-15)
  Participant
  @devarshi-ranjan
  TYPE-5 “Reverse Onus Clauses: Detrimental Impacts”
- October 1, 2022 at 9:56 pm #30422
  Kiara Dsouza (2020-31)
  Participant
  @kiara-dsouza
  type 5 analysing lawyer-client confidentiality and its limitations
- September 30, 2022 at 2:12 pm #30416
  Samayra Adlakha (2020-52)
  Participant
  @samayra-adlakha
  Type 5: Admissibility of psychological syndrome evidence in trials in India (Focus on Rape Trauma Syndrome and Battered Women Syndrome)
- September 27, 2022 at 6:00 pm #30397
  Sharun Salvi (2020-55)
  Participant
  @sharun-salvi
  Type 5- Research paper on Section 122 Marital Privilege
- September 16, 2022 at 11:32 pm #30330
  Krishnam Saboo (2020-32)
  Participant
  @krishnam-saboo
  Type-4: Evidentiary Value of Call recordings
- September 10, 2022 at 5:25 pm #30216
  Sushmita Gupta (2020-65)
  Participant
  @sushmita-gupta
  Type-4 Development of law on Section 113A and 113B
- September 9, 2022 at 4:58 pm #30211
  Jayanth Mutyala (2020-39)
  Participant
  @jayanth-mutyala
  Type-4 Development of law on DNA evidence.
- September 9, 2022 at 4:01 pm #30210
  Kaarthiheyan D (2020-29)
  Participant
  @kaarthiheyan-d
  Type 4: Development of Law on Voice samples
- September 9, 2022 at 10:02 am #30207
  Saambhavi Jha (2020-49)
  Participant
  @saambhavi-jha
  Type 4- Evidentiary value of hostile witnesses
- September 8, 2022 at 9:03 am #30199
  Dhanush Thonaparthi (2020-16)
  Participant
  @dhanush-thonaparthi
  Type 4 – Evidentiary value of a photograph
- September 7, 2022 at 6:29 pm #30190
  Harini (2020-19)
  Participant
  @harini
  Type 4: Judge’s power to summon and question witnesses (Sec 165, 162)
- August 31, 2022 at 12:31 pm #30129
  Ameesha Rayamajhi (2020-05)
  Participant
  @ameesha-rayamajhi
  a theoretical analysis of the doctrine of poisonous tree and its relevance across jurisdictions
- August 30, 2022 at 11:08 pm #30121
  R Sanjana (2020-46)
  Participant
  @r-sanjana
  Type 3: Scholarly exposition– Evidence as to affairs of state- Section 123
  - This reply was modified 2 years, 8 months ago by R Sanjana (2020-46).
  - This reply was modified 2 years, 8 months ago by R Sanjana (2020-46).
  - September 5, 2022 at 8:28 am #30168
    R Sanjana (2020-46)
    Participant
    
    @r-sanjana
    Admissibility of self-corroborating evidence in India- Type 3 (updated after consultation)
- August 30, 2022 at 2:55 pm #30115
  Mohd Abdul Majid Farhan (2020-36)
  Participant
  @mohd-abdul-majid-farhan
  Type 3 Admissibility & Legality of Phone Tapping in Indian Jurisprudence
- August 30, 2022 at 11:10 am #30110
  Harsh (2020-20)
  Participant
  @harsh
  Type 3 – admissibility of social media evidence
- August 29, 2022 at 7:18 pm #30093
  Harsh Raj (2020-21)
  Participant
  @harsh-raj
  Type 3 (Scholarly Exposition): Admissibility of expert testimony in sexual abuse cases
- August 29, 2022 at 7:14 pm #30092
  Aditya Raj (2020 -01)
  Participant
  @aditya-raj
  Type 3: Narcoanalysis in the Indian evidence jurisprudence.
- August 29, 2022 at 12:38 pm #30081
  Pranjal Preet Alishan (2020-44)
  Participant
  @pranjal-preet-alishan
  Type 3 – Illegally collected Evidence
- August 10, 2022 at 5:14 pm #30030
  Barkha Singh (2020-13)
  Participant
  @barkha-singh
  TYPE- 4- DEVELOPMENT AND LIBERALISATION OF HEARSAY DOCTRINE.
- August 1, 2022 at 9:41 pm #29875
  Kartheek Vegesana (2020-69)
  Academic Representative
  @kartheek-vegesana
  Type 2 – Case Law Review – cases under section 30 of Indian Evidence Act
- August 1, 2022 at 4:09 pm #29857
  Jaskaran Singh (2020-28)
  Participant
  @jaskaran-singh
  Type 2 – Irrelevance of Character Evidence in Rape Trials
- August 1, 2022 at 3:25 pm #29853
  Shreyam Sharma
  Participant
  @shreyam-sharma
  Type 2- Evidentiary Value of Extra-Judicial Confessions.
- July 29, 2022 at 12:57 am #29785
  AMARENDRA SHUKLA (2020-)
  Participant
  @amarendra-kumar-shukla
  Type 2:: Admissibility and Validity of Voice recordings and Whatsapp texts in the context of self incrimination.
- July 28, 2022 at 10:45 pm #29783
  Srivalli V Kondapalli (2020-64)
  Participant
  @srivalli-v-kondapalli
  Type 2: Case Law Review ~ S.27 Indian Evidence Act,
  
  How much of information received from accused may be proved.
- July 28, 2022 at 5:51 pm #29776
  Ishan Dhiman (2020-26)
  Participant
  @ishan-dhiman
  Type 2- Section 17 and 24 – “The Relevancy and admissibility of Admissions and Confession”-Time Period ( 1965-1985)
- July 28, 2022 at 3:03 pm #29775
  Shreya Bhukhmaria (2020-59)
  Participant
  @shreya-bhukhmaria
  TYPE 2 on Section 25 of the Indian evidence Act and who qualifies to be a police officer.
- July 26, 2022 at 10:19 am #29746
  Siri Reddy Rachha (2020-63)
  Participant
  @siri-reddy-rachha
  Type 2 – Section 167 IEA.
- July 24, 2022 at 4:07 pm #29709
  Rashika Bodh (2020-48)
  Participant
  @rashika-bodh
  Type 2 : Electronic Evidence
- July 22, 2022 at 10:13 pm #29690
  Naman Kumar(2020-41)
  Participant
  @naman-kumar
  Type 2 (Case Law Review) – T.I.P. (s.9)
- July 21, 2022 at 2:17 pm #29664
  Harshit Singh (2020-22)
  Participant
  @harshit-singh
  Type 2 – Case Law review of Supreme Court’s decision on Expert Opinion.
- July 19, 2022 at 10:33 am #29624
  Shashwat Mishra (2020-56)
  Participant
  @shashwat-mishra
  [postquote quote=29268]
  Govindaswamy vs State of Kerala
- July 18, 2022 at 6:18 pm #29614
  Himanshu Mehra (2020-25)
  Participant
  @himanshu-mehra
  Type 1 – Shaikh Babar Shaikh Noor V. The State of Maharashtra
- July 13, 2022 at 6:17 pm #29529
  Lakshya Anant (2020-33)
  Participant
  @lakshya-anant
  Type 1: Parubai Versus The State of Maharashtra
- July 13, 2022 at 2:48 pm #29518
  Trisha Choudhary (2020-67)
  Participant
  @trisha-choudhary
  Type 2: Case law review on the evolution of the law on illegally obtained evidence.
- July 11, 2022 at 10:48 pm #29476
  Manas Thakur (2020-34)
  Participant
  @manas-thakur
  Type 1 (Case Comment): Digamber Vaishnav v. State of Chhattisgarh, (2019)
- July 11, 2022 at 7:49 pm #29472
  Sajiv Doley (2020-51)
  Participant
  @sajiv-doley
  Type 1 (case comment) : Tomaso Bruno and anr v/s State of UP
- July 11, 2022 at 6:18 pm #29469
  Shivendra Pandey (2020-58)
  Participant
  @shivendra-pandey
  Type 1
  Chennadi Jalapathi Reddy vs Baddam Pratapa Reddy
- July 11, 2022 at 5:29 pm #29468
  Archita Satish (2020-09)
  Participant
  @archita-satish
  Type 2: Case Law Review on the reliance on child witnesses under Section 118 of the Indian Evidence Act through an analysis of Supreme Court Decisions between 2003-2022 (20 years).
- July 8, 2022 at 4:32 pm #29419
  DARSHIL SAKHIA (2020-)
  Participant
  @darshil-sakhia
  Type 1: Mangala Waman Karandikar (D) TR. LRS. v. Prakash Damodar Ranad (2021)
- July 8, 2022 at 9:49 am #29408
  Ishika Garg 27 (2020-27)
  Participant
  @ishika-garg-27
  Type 1: Deepti Kapur v. Kunal Julka
- July 8, 2022 at 8:22 am #29407
  Tanul Tanay (2020-66)
  Participant
  @tanul-tanay
  Type 1 – Jayamma & Anr. v. The State of Karnataka
- July 7, 2022 at 11:42 pm #29406
  Pratham Shah (2020-54)
  Participant
  @pratham-shah
  Type 1 – Yashwant Sinha v. CBI, (2019) 6 SCC 1
  - This reply was modified 2 years, 10 months ago by Pratham Shah (2020-54).
  - This reply was modified 2 years, 10 months ago by Pratham Shah (2020-54).
- July 7, 2022 at 10:59 pm #29404
  Tejaswi Baban Patil
  Participant
  @tejaswi-patil
  Type 1- Shafhi Mohammad v. State of Himachal Pradesh
- July 7, 2022 at 3:41 pm #29397
  Manav Ganapathy (2020-35)
  Participant
  @manav-ganapathy
  Type 2: Section 112 – Birth during marriage, conclusive proof of legitimacy
- July 6, 2022 at 11:09 pm #29387
  Khush Bhachawat (2020-30)
  Participant
  @khush-bhachawat
  Type 1 – Alli Noushad v. Rasheed & Anr. on Section 122 (Marital Confidence)
- July 4, 2022 at 11:51 pm #29343
  Barkha Singh (2020-13)
  Participant
  @barkha-singh
  TYPE-4-DEVELOPMENT OF LAW ON ADMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC LAW
- July 4, 2022 at 9:34 pm #29340
  Mukund Garg (2020-38)
  Participant
  @mukund-garg
  Type 1:Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal
- July 4, 2022 at 8:28 pm #29337
  Rohan Yasala (2020-50)
  Participant
  @rohan-yasala
  Type-3 : Dibs on Articles related to Dying declaration.
Author

Replies